Chemistry, pharmacology, and chiral separation of proton pump inhibitor drugs
Khadidja Addadi, Nasser Belboukhari, Khaled Sekkoum
Abstract
A chiral sulfoxide is an important group in many bioactive molecules, and its absolute configuration often has substantial effects on its biological activity. Compounds that contain tri-coordinated sulfur atoms in a pyramidal structure can exist in different optically active forms. Omeprazole is a highly successful sulfoxide drug and the first registered substance in the proton pump inhibitor class, whose chirality may significantly impact its interaction with biological targets. The R-enantiomer of omeprazole is rapidly metabolized. In contrast, the clearance of the S-enantiomer occurs at a much slower rate. Viewing this, further attention should be paid to the pharmacological and toxicological studies of individual enantiomers of chiral drugs, and thus led to an exigent demand for enantioseparation.
Keywords
References
- Han J, Soloshonok VA, Klika KD, Drabowicz J, Wzorek A. Chiral sulfoxides: Advances in asymmetric synthesis and problems with the accurate determination of the stereochemical outcome. Chemical Society. Review. 2018; 47(4): 1307-1350. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00703a
- Spence J. Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of omeprazole and related compounds. no. August 2018, [online]. Available: https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/22178/
- Wojaczyńska E, Wojaczyński J. Sulfoxides in medicine. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2023; 76(1-9): 102340. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2023.102340
- Bentley R. Role of sulfur chirality in the chemical processes of biology. Chemical Society Review. 2005; 34(7): 609-624. doi: 10.1039/b418284g
- Peng T, Cheng X, Chen Y, Yang J. Sulfoxide reductases and applications in biocatalytic preparation of chiral sulfoxides: A mini-review. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2021; 9: 1-9. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.714899
- Young A. Chiral sulfoxides: Synthesis and utility. 2008; 1-8. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.
- de Figueiredo S, Binda N, Nogueira-Machado J, Vieira-Filho S, Caligiorne R. The antioxidant properties of organosulfur compounds (Sulforaphane). Recent Patents on Endocrine, Metabolism and Immune Drug Discovery. 2015; 9(1): 24-39. doi: 10.2174/1872214809666150505164138
- Garcia-Oliveira P, Otero P, Pereira AG, Chamorro F, Carpena M, Echave J, et al. Status and challenges of plant-anticancer compounds in cancer treatment. Pharmaceuticals. 2021; 14(2): 1-28. doi: 10.3390/ph14020157
- Bansal M, Singh N, Pal S, Dev I, Ansari KM. Chemopreventive role of dietary phytochemicals in colorectal cancer, 1st ed. 12. Elsevier B.V, 2018. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64199-1.00004-X
- Le Daré B, Ferron PJ, Gicquel T. Toxic effects of amanitins: Repurposing toxicities toward new therapeutics. Toxins (Basel). 2021; 13(6): 1-10. doi: 10.3390/toxins13060417
- Lutz C, Simon W, Werner-Simon S, Pahl A, Müller C. Total synthesis of α- and β-amanitin, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2020; 59(28): 11390-11393. doi: 10.1002/anie.201914935
- Zheng C, Lv S, Ye J, Zou L, Zhu K, Li H, Dong Y, Li L. Metabolomic insights into the mechanisms of ganoderic acid: Protection against α-amanitin-induced liver injury. Metabolites. 2023; 13(11): 1164. Metabolites. doi: 10.3390/metabo13111164
- Siegert MAJ, Knittel CH, Süssmuth RD. A convergent total synthesis of the death cap toxin α-amanitin. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2020; 59(14): 5500-5504. doi: 10.1002/anie.201914620
- Tavassoli M, Afshari A, Arsene AL, Mégarbane B, Dumanov J, Paoliello MMB, et al. Toxicological profile of Amanita virosa - A narrative review. Toxicology Reports. 2019; 6. 2018. 143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep. 2019.01.002
- Tomoe H. Dimethyl sulfoxide: A review of pharmacology and clinical effect on interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Continence. 2023; 8: 101058. doi: 10.1016/j.cont.2023.101058
- Santos NC, Figueira-Coelho J, Martins-Silva J, Saldanha C. Multidisciplinary utilization of dimethyl sulfoxide: Pharmacological, cellular, and molecular aspects. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2003; 65(7): 1035-1041. doi: 10.1016/S0006-2952(03)00002-9
- Jacob SW, de la Torre JC. Pharmacology of dimethyl sulfoxide in cardiac and CNS damage. Pharmacology Reports. 2009; 61(2): 225-235. doi: 10.1016/S1734-1140(09)70026-X
- Robertson P, Hellriegel ET. Clinical pharmacokinetic profile of modafinil. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2003; 42(2): 123-137. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342020-00002
- Minzenberg MJ, Carter CS. Modafinil: A review of neurochemical actions and effects on cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008; 33(7): 1477-1502. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301534
- Ramachandra B. A critical review of properties of modafinil and analytical, bioanalytical methods for its determination. Critical Review in Analytical Chemistry. 2016; 46(6): 482-489. doi: 10.1080/10408347.2016. 1153948
- Darwish M, Kirby M, Hellriegel ET, Robertson P. Armodafinil and modafinil have substantially different pharmacokinetic profiles despite having the same terminal half-lives: Analysis of data from three randomized, single-dose, pharmacokinetic studies. Clinical Drug Investigation. 2009; 29(9): 613-623. doi: 10.2165/ 11315280-000000000-00000
- Davies N, Watson MS. Clinical pharmacokinetics of sulindac: A dynamic old drug. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 1997; 32(6): 437-459. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199732060-00002
- Klibanov OM, Williams SH, Iler CA. Cenicriviroc, an orally active CCR5 antagonist for the potential treatment of HIV infection. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs. 2010; 11(8): 940-950.
- Awasthi A, Rahman MA, Bhagavan Raju M. Synthesis, in silico studies, and in vitro anti-inflammatory activity of novel imidazole derivatives targeting p38 MAP Kinase. ACS Omega. 2023; 8(20): 17788-17799. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00605
- Li Q, Liu Y, Yang M, Jin L, Wu Y, Tang L, He L, Wu D, Zhang Z. Mechanism of Radix Scutellariae in the treatment of influenza: A based on network pharmacology and molecular docking. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2022; 10(6): 351. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1176
- Tanaka M, Yamazaki H, Hakusui H. Direct HPLC separation of enantiomers of pantoprazole and other benzimidazole sulfoxides using cellulose‐based chiral stationary phases in reversed‐phase mode. Chirality. 1995; 7(8): 612-615. doi: 10.1002/chir.530070810
- Gallinella B, Ferretti R, Zanitti L, Sestili I, Mosca A, Cirilli R. Comparison of reversed-phase enantioselective HPLC methods for determining the enantiomeric purity of (S)-omeprazole in the presence of its related substances. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2016; 6(2): 132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.001
- Chennuru LN, Choppari T, Duvvuri S, Dubey PK. Enantiomeric separation of proton pump inhibitors on new generation chiral columns using LC and supercritical fluid chromatography. Journal of Separation. Sciences. 2013; 36(18): 3004-3010. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201300419
- Papp LA, Foroughbakhshfasaei M, Fiser B, Horváth P, Kiss E, Sekkoum K. Reversed-phase HPLC enantioseparation of pantoprazole using a teicoplanin aglycone stationary phase-Determination of the enantiomer elution order using HPLC-CD analyses. Chirality. 2020; 32(2): 158-167. doi: 10.1002/chir.23146
- Papp LA, Hancu G, Gyéresi Á, Kelemen H, Szabó ZI, Noszál B, Dubský P, Tóth G. Chiral separation of lansoprazole and rabeprazole by capillary electrophoresis using dual cyclodextrin systems. Electrophoresis. 2019; 40(21): 2799-2805. doi: 10.1002/elps.201900107
- Al-badr AA. Chapter 4 - Omeprazole. Profiles of drug substances, Excipients, and Related Methodology. 2010; 35: 151-262. doi: 10.1016/S1871-5125(10)35004-7
- Horn J. The proton-pump inhibitors: Similarities and differences. Clinical Therapeutics. 2000; 22(3): 266-280. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)80032-6
- Mullin JM, Gabello M, Murray LJ, Farrell CP, Bellows J, Wolov KR, et al. Proton pump inhibitors: actions and reactions. Drug Discovery Today. 2009; 14(13-14): 647-660. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.03.014
- Sachs G, Shin JM, Howden CW. The clinical pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2006; 23(S2): 2-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02943.x
- Shin JM, Sachs G. Pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Current Gastroenterology Reports. 2008; 10(6): 528-534. doi: 10.1007/s11894-008-0098-
- Huang JQ, Hunt RH. Pharmacological and pharmacodynamic essentials of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors for the practising physician. Best Practice Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 2001; 15(3): 355-370. doi: 10.1053/bega.2001.0184
- Litwack G. Membrane Transport. 2008. In: Human Biochemistry and Disease. AP Publisher, China. ISBN-13: 978-0124528154
- Waller DG, Sampson AP. Dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease. Medical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2018; 401-410. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-7020-7167-6.00033-6
- Robinson M, Horn J. Clinical pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors: What the practising physician needs to know. Drugs. 2003; 63(24): 2739-2754. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363240-00004
- Besancon M, Simon A, Sachs G, Shin JM. Sites of reaction of the gastric H,K-ATPase with extracytoplasmic thiol reagents. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1997; 272(36): 22438-22446. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.36.22438
- Shin JM, Kim N. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the proton pump inhibitors. Journal of Neuro-gastroenterology and Motility. 2013; 19(1): 25-35. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.1.25
- Welage LS. Pharmacologic properties of proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacotherapy. 2003; 23(10 Pt2): 74S-80S. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.13.74S.31929
- Bonato PS, Paias FO. Enantioselective analysis of omeprazole in pharmaceutical formulations by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society. 2004; 15(2): 318-323. doi: 10.1590/S0103-50532004000200025
- Zanitti L, Ferretti R, Gallinella B, La Torre F, Sanna ML, Mosca A, Cirilli R. Direct HPLC enantioseparation of omeprazole and its chiral impurities: Application to the determination of enantiomeric purity of esomeprazole magnesium trihydrate. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2010; 52(5): 665-671. doi: 10.1016/ j.jpba.2010.02.021
- Vyas S, Patel A, Ladva K, Joshi H, Bapodra A. Development and validation of a stability indicating method for the enantioselective estimation of omeprazole enantiomers in the enteric-coated formulations by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Pharmaceutical Bioallied Sciences. 2011; 3(2): 310-314. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.80766
- Ferretti R, Zanitti L, Casulli A, Cirilli R. Green high-performance liquid chromatography enantioseparation of lansoprazole using a cellulose-based chiral stationary phase under ethanol/water mode. Journal of Separation Science. 2016; 39(8): 1418-1424. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201501329
- Rahman A, Haque MR, Sultan MZ, Rahman MM, Rashid MA. Enantiomeric determination of omeprazole and esomeprazole by a developed and validated chiral HPLC method and stability studies by microthermal analysis. Dhaka University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017; 16(2): 221-233. doi: 10.3329/dujps.v16i2.35261
- Xiong F, Yang BB, Zhang J, Li L. Enantioseparation, stereochemical assignment and chiral recognition mechanism of sulfoxide-containing drugs. Molecules. 2018; 23(10): 2680. doi: 10.3390/molecules23102680
- Hamache T, Belboukhari N, Sekkoum K, Ghouizi M. Chiral screening approach of atorvastatin diastereomers by HPLC method. Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024; 4(1): 121-125. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10814722
- Cârcu-Dobrin M, Hancu G, Papp LA, Fülöp I, Kelemen H. Development of a chiral capillary electrophoresis method for the enantioseparation of verapamil using cyclodextrins as chiral selectors and experimental design optimization. Symmetry (Basel). 2021; 13(11): 2186; doi: 10.3390/sym13112186
- Addadi K, Sekkoum K, Belboukhari N, ALOthman ZA, Aljuwayid AM, Sillanpää M, et al. Enantio-resolution of some chiral sulfoxide drugs on amylose and cellulose-based stationary phases: Elution order, absolute configuration and chiral mechanism determination. Microchemical Journal. 2023; 193: 109019. doi. 10.1016/ j.microc.2023.109019
Submitted date:
02/01/2025
Reviewed date:
10/17/2025
Accepted date:
10/27/2025
